|
Peter Mörtenböck & Helge Mooshammer
research and writings on art, architecture and politics
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
thresholds no 30, summer 2005 Cambridge (MA): MIT, ISSN 1091-711X thresholds.mit.edu
Freerunning and the Hugged City Peter Mörtenböck Editorial The platonic concept of a systemic connection between our individual being and the world as a whole has shaped the contours of mysticism, alchemy, philosophy, aesthetics and the arts throughout history. Even though in classical thought, a microcosm is primarily defined as a self-enclosed and monadic sphere, it is imagined to have a crucial relationship to the outside. This interaction has been described either as a homologous relationship between internal patterns and outside forces, or alternatively, as one in which a system follows its own logic independent of the outside. The model of the microcosm has gained new relevance in the current modes of globalization. To counter the homogeneity implied by their global geo-economic operations, multinational corporations are more than willing to present microcosmic identities as possibilities of individualistic escape. What critical potential does the idea of the microcosm hold in this realm? Does the opposition between a global enclosure and microcosmic systems still offer a productive line of thinking, or is the global/local dialectic defunct? How have art and architectural practices participated in staging or undermining the idea of microcosm and its associated ideologies throughout history? Read whole issue online or download PDF _back to home |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|